British cardiologist is warning the british public
What I would like to say is:
You need to understand that the current system is encouraging good people to do bad things. And the root of this problem are big very powerful corporations that have too much influence on government, on healthcare, on media, and their primary responsibility is to produce profit for their shareholders and not to give you the best treatment.
When you understand that, then we can start doing something to transform the system. And I don’t say this lightly. This is been well documented that these corporations, unfortunately, in the way that they go about their business by misleading people, by their business model being fraud, they act like psychopaths, and they are a psychopathic entity. Ultimately, the conclusion is that we have a psychopathic entity influencing health policy, and that needs to stop, and it needs to stop now.
So, Aseem, we’ve met today to talk about a paper you’ve written, which is published. Well, it will be published by the time this interview goes out. Maybe you could give us a little bit of background about how and why this paper has come about, and then we can talk about the content of it.
So, what I’ve done recently is critically appraise the evidence around the Covid vaccine, specifically the mRNA vaccine. And the reason I looked into this, is that. I suffered a quite personal tragedy with the sudden death of my father in July of last year. He was a very fit and well man. He was 73 years old. During the whole of lockdown, he was walking 10 to 15,000 steps a day. He was very conscientious of his diet. I had assessed his heart a few years earlier, and in fact, he actually improved his lifestyle since then. But his post-mortem findings really shocked me. There were two severe blockages in his coronary arteries, which didn’t really make any sense with everything I know, both as a cardiologist, and as someone who has an expertise in this particular area, and also intimately knowing my dad’s lifestyle and his health.
Not long after that, data started to emerge that suggested there was a possible link between the mRNA vaccine and increased risk of heart attacks from a mechanism of increasing inflammation around the coronary arteries.
But on top of that I was then contacted by a whistleblower at a very prestigious university in the UK. A cardiologist himself, who explained to me that there were similar research findings in his department. And those researchers had decided to essentially cover that up because they were worried about losing research funding from pharmaceutical industry.
But it doesn’t stop there. I then started looking at data in the UK to see: Had there been any increase in cardiac arrest? My dad suffered a cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death at home. Had been any change in the UK since the vaccine rollout? And again, those findings were very, very clear. There’s been an extra 14,000 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in 2021 versus 2020. So, post vaccine rollout again. My own clinical experience, several people I know in my own social circle, at least half a dozen people unexpectedly suffered sudden cardiac death within weeks to months of having the vaccine. Again unexpected. So, for me, the evidence is very, very clear.
When you look back at the original Pfizer trial and the randomised controlled trial published in the “Journal of Medicine”, that actually was the basis on which there was a huge vaccine roll out across the world for this particular vaccine, there is a smoking gun. If you look at the supplementary appendix there: There were four cardiac arrests in the vaccine group versus one in the placebo. When you put it all together, it makes a very strong case that there is a clear link between this particular vaccine and increasing cardiac risk. We now know it causes myocarditis in probably up to one in 2,700 people, which is inflammation of the heart muscle. We know there’s a signal for cardiac arrests. Recent data from Israel published in “Nature Scientific Data Report” shows in people in the ages between 16 and 39 there was a 25 percent increase in either heart attacks or cardiac arrests, not linked to Covid, but absolutely linked to the vaccines, the mRNA vaccine. So as far as I’m concerned, the evidence is overwhelming. This vaccine does have a strong link with increasing cardiac arrest risk and cardiac death.
James: What you want to happen?
Aseem: Well, I think that the data now, if you look at in totality, first of all, we need to have a more robust analysis where people can understand what the benefit of the potential vaccine is for them versus the harms. But the upshot from everything I’ve looked at in these papers, which have been published, is, that I think that the evidence is very, very strong to call for a complete suspension of this vaccine, pending an enquiry, so that we can have a more honest discussion about who potentially benefits and who’s gonna get more harm than good, if at all.
James: And, you know, I think most people watching this, will be aware of some censorship that goes on, and I mean, this is a huge thing for you to put yourself out there like this. Are you worried about that at all?
Aseem: No. For me, what’s most important, my duty is to patients and to scientific integrity. And to the truth. And we have to be able to allow the legitimate questions around this to be asked. Unfortunately, because of too much Corporate capture of public health, of politicians, of government, of the media, this debate has not been allowed to happen, and, you know, this already is having catastrophic consequences for trust in public health and in medicine. And my duty, my responsibility is to restore that trust, but also allow honest conversations to happen between doctors and patients, which has not happened unfortunately, it’s very clear now, with the rollout of this vaccine.
James: And, of cause, this is very, very personal to you. I mean, how do you feel? How do you feel about the whole episode now? Because I think, you know, early on, when this started to emerge, the questions, you were kind of on the other side of the bench when you were kind of like “I don’t think it’s the vaccines.” And you’ve come full circle now based upon the evidence you’ve seen.
Aseem: Yeah. I mean, just add to that, James. To be honest, I was very supportive of the vaccine roll out at the beginning. I was one of the first to have the vaccine because I helped out the vaccine centre. So, I was given, you know, what was left over. I had it very early on. My dad as well. He was a very prominent doctor, one of the most respected doctors in the UK, may be the most prolific campaigner for the NHS as a doctor the last three decades. He was vice president of the British Medical Association. And to now, I have no doubt in my mind, that this vaccine killed him. I am his only advocate. He was the last surviving member of my immediate family, and I have a duty to him as well and to public health to get this information out.
James: Yes, Aseem. I think one of the clear things with all of this is, you are not anti-vax, right? You’ve worked in the vaccine centre, you have been very, very supportive of the health system as the vaccine roll out went. I think that’s important to mention because there are people who will try to present this as some kind of anti-vax movement.
Assem: No, sure. And I think, you know, anyone that wants to frame this as anti-vax, are either very misguided or they have a personal vested interest linked to the drug industry. What I would say: Look at the facts. I was one of the first to have it. I helped in the vaccine centre. I was on “God Morning Britain” and you can look at the footage, I was on “Good Morning Britain, because I convinced a hesitant vaccine film director, who I thought was high-risk, to have the vaccine, and I was explaining why I felt that. If you look at the history: Traditionally in medicine, of all drugs that we prescribe or we give or are used to treat illness or even from prevention perspective, vaccines traditionally have been the safest, and vaccines are still in my view, the safest. But this particular vaccine was rolled out in very unusual, unexpected circumstances and got emergency use authorization. And I think, for me, what really made me realize something more sinister going on was when it got mandated. What we normally do in this country, we’ve never mandated other vaccines. We use persuasion and encouragement for people to take vaccines. But when it got mandated, for me, I then realised that there was something else going on, which has now translated very clearly for me, that this was primarily to serve the profits of the drug industry, of Pfizer in this particular case, and not that of public health. And there needs to be an enquiry. And until we get this, an open, transparent discussion. I think the situation in terms of our health, in terms of moving forward to the future medicine, is very, very dire.
James: So, your paper and your message basically about the vaccine?
Who is probably the most important person that you think has the power to actually listen and act on that?
Aseem: I think every single citizen needs to hear this.
James: What would you like to say to them, directly?
Aseem: I think, I would like to say:
You need to understand that the current system is encouraging good people to do bad things. In the root of this problem are big very powerful corporations that have too much influence on government, on healthcare, on media. And their primary responsibility is to produce profit for their shareholders, not to give you the best treatment. When you understand that, then we can start doing something to transform the system. And I don’t say this lightly. This is been well documented that these corporations, unfortunately, in the way that they go about their business by misleading people, by their business model being fraud, they act like psychopaths, and they are a psychopathic entity.
And we have, ultimately, the conclusion is that we have a psychopathic entity influencing health policy. And that needs to stop, and it needs to stop now.
Peer reviewed Report by Dr. Assem Malhotra